Anybody protesting a judge’s home should be arrested on the spot by federal law enforcement. “If they’re there and they’re doing it peacefully, you know, I’m for that ability on either side of the political spectrum.”Ĭotton, a potential 2024 presidential candidate, said Wednesday in an interview: “There is a federal law that prohibits the protesting of judges’ homes. “I’m a First Amendment guy, and I think that cuts both ways,” Braun said in an interview. Mike Braun, R-Ind., said he, too, believes peaceful protests - even outside the homes of justices - is protected speech. “Because if we start fearing our rights to speak and express our religious convictions, and if we fear assembly, the consequences of parsing those rights are extremely dangerous.” … We should all be erring in favor of the First Amendment, in favor of freedom of speech, in favor of freedom of religion, in favor of the freedom of assembly,” she said. “First Amendment rights are so, so special. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., a former member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, said Wednesday. “I think if they’re being peaceful and are staying off their property and are not disrupting neighborhoods or causing or inciting fear, it’s probably a legitimate expression of free speech,” Sen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |